可持续性主张稽核代理

概览

价值

功能说明

• 先核那个边界

  一份把供应链排除在外却不说明的足迹，是最常见、也最有后果的失败——被排除掉的那部分通常是最大的。

• 把每一条宣称追溯到它的计算

  几年前由一个真心相信它的人写下的营销文案，从来没有被对照一个数字核过。

• 把碳信用追到它的注销记录

  「碳中和」需要一张有人拿得出来的证书。而往往没有人拿得出来。

• 识别被重述过的基线

  一次相对于悄悄挪动过的基线的减排，是挑战者最先会去找的那条发现。

• 把你自己各处的发布对照起来

  网站、年报和投标答复。全都是公开的，全都被同一个挑战者读。

• 不计算、不宣称

  它绝不产出一个足迹数字，也绝不起草一条宣称。它报告你的证据支撑什么、不支撑什么。

这会改变什么

运行方式

该智能体通过 PROMIVO 运行时在服务器端运行。每次运行都会逐步记录，每次工具调用在执行前都会进行权限检查。

1. 1输入按智能体的输入结构进行校验
2. 2模型claude-opus-5，并自动回退
3. 3工具search_knowledge, extract_structured_data
4. 4权限自动执行 READ 级操作；更高的等待你批准
5. 5输出符合输出结构的结构化结果
6. 6日志记录 token、耗时和每一个步骤

演示

演示数据Illustrative sample output, abridged.

{
  "claims": [],
  "reportingYear": "2026"
}

{
  "claims": [
    {
      "claim": "\"We have cut our emissions by 42% since 2019.\"",
      "status": "partly-substantiated",
      "channel": "Website homepage",
      "chainBreaksAt": "The calculation supports 42% within the stated boundary. The boundary excludes the supply chain and the homepage does not say so. The qualifier exists in the annual report, three documents away from where the claim is read.",
      "evidenceFound": "Calculation present, method documented, source data traceable."
    },
    {
      "claim": "\"Our packaging is 80% recycled content.\"",
      "status": "unsupported",
      "channel": "Product pages",
      "chainBreaksAt": "The 80% comes from a supplier's marketing page. No specification, no certificate, no test report. A supplier's own marketing cannot support your published claim.",
      "evidenceFound": "None beyond the supplier's website."
    }
  ],
  "boundary": {
    "stated": "Direct operations and purchased energy.",
    "excludes": [
      "The entire supply chain",
      "Product use",
      "Business travel"
    ],
    "disclosedWhereClaimed": false
  },
  "escalate": true,
  "disclaimer": "A check of claims against the evidence supplied. No emissions or other figure has been calculated or estimated, no claim has been drafted or reworded, no statement is made that any claim is lawful or compliant, and this is not legal advice on green claims regulation.",
  "offsetFindings": [
    "The carbon neutral claim rests on 12,000 tonnes of offsets. Purchase evidence exists for 12,000. Retirement certificates exist for 7,400. Purchased is not retired, and the gap is the claim."
  ],
  "escalationReason": "A published claim has no evidence beyond a supplier's marketing page, offset retirement covers only 62% of the volume claimed, a baseline was restated without disclosure, and three public channels state three different reduction figures.",
  "qualifierPlacement": [
    "The boundary qualifier the headline claim depends on appears only in an appendix of a separate document."
  ],
  "baselineRestatements": [
    "The 2019 baseline was restated upward by 6% in the 2024 report. The restatement is not disclosed anywhere, and it improves every reduction percentage published since. This is what a challenger looks for first."
  ],
  "channelContradictions": [
    "The website says 42% reduction. The annual report says 31% on the same base year. A tender response in June said 45%. All three are public."
  ]
}

使用条件

使用场景

价格

常见问题

评价

客户运行过该智能体后，评价功能将开放。