排程利用率分析师

概览

价值

功能说明

• 找出那些什么都填不进去的空档

  两个预约之间的二十分钟不是产能。一周九个就是一天，而没有任何使用率数字会显示它。

• 抓住那项总是超时的治疗

  排四十分钟、实际花五十五分钟，一整年每一次都如此。那才是下午会拖的原因，而不是员工。

• 展示从业者之间的失衡

  一位被排到超出产能，另一位闲着，因为前台按客人点名来排，而没有人看到整块板子。

• 点名真正的那个约束

  很多时候是一个房间或一台机器，而不是所有人以为的那些人。

• 把服务结构对着钱摆出来

  一天被又短又好排的预约填满，而它推掉了那些付得起房间成本的长项目。两个事实，同一页。

• 不评判任何个人

  发现是关于时段、服务和约束的。一张按人排的产出榜会被「管理」，而不是被修好。

这会改变什么

运行方式

该智能体通过 PROMIVO 运行时在服务器端运行。每次运行都会逐步记录，每次工具调用在执行前都会进行权限检查。

1. 1输入按智能体的输入结构进行校验
2. 2模型claude-sonnet-5，并自动回退
3. 3工具extract_structured_data
4. 4权限自动执行 READ 级操作；更高的等待你批准
5. 5输出符合输出结构的结构化结果
6. 6日志记录 token、耗时和每一个步骤

演示

演示数据Illustrative sample output, abridged.

{
  "currency": "USD",
  "appointments": [],
  "shortestSellableMinutes": 30
}

{
  "escalate": false,
  "overruns": [
    {
      "fix": "Schedule it at fifty-five. You lose nothing — you are already spending it — and the afternoon stops collapsing.",
      "knockOn": "Every afternoon with two or more laser sessions finishes late. The last appointment of those days is cancelled or rushed four times more often than on other days.",
      "service": "Laser session",
      "scheduledMinutes": 40,
      "typicalActualMinutes": 55
    }
  ],
  "imbalance": [
    "Nadia is booked at 94% of capacity, Leyla at 61%. The desk books who was asked for, and nobody sees both boards at once."
  ],
  "disclaimer": "Findings describe slots, services and rooms. No individual has been assessed, and nothing in your calendar has been changed.",
  "serviceMix": {
    "finding": "Short consultations filled the hours that laser sessions were turned away from. The diary was full and those hours earned about a third of what the displaced work would have.",
    "assumption": "Assumes every turned-away laser request would have booked. If half would have, halve the figure — it is still the largest single item here.",
    "valueForgone": 7400
  },
  "fixableByRule": [
    "Schedule laser at its real duration.",
    "Reserve two afternoon blocks a week in Treatment 2 for long services."
  ],
  "needsResource": [
    "A second laser unit would remove the constraint, but the two rules above should be tried first."
  ],
  "realConstraint": "Treatment 2, not the staff. It is the limiting resource in 71% of the weeks examined, and adding practitioner hours would not have added a single bookable slot.",
  "unsellableGaps": {
    "detail": "Nineteen gaps of twenty to twenty-five minutes across the week, none long enough for your shortest service. Utilisation reads 81% and this is inside the missing 19%, but it is not idle time — it is time that was never sellable.",
    "hoursPerWeek": 6.3,
    "valuePerWeek": 1890,
    "worstResource": "Treatment 2"
  },
  "supportedByData": [
    "Gaps",
    "Overruns",
    "Practitioner imbalance",
    "Room constraint"
  ],
  "escalationReason": "",
  "notSupportedByData": [
    "Seasonality — only fourteen weeks of history were supplied, which is not enough to separate a season from a run."
  ]
}

使用条件

使用场景

价格

常见问题

评价

客户运行过该智能体后，评价功能将开放。