律师账单稽核代理

概览

价值

功能说明

• 先标出打包计费

  把几项任务塞进一条长条目，会击垮其他每一项核对。你无法判断一个你看不进去的四小时。

• 把每位计时人员对照价目表核对

  总有人出现在案件上，而他们从未被约定过，费率也从未被约定过。

• 找出职级错配

  准则指定给助理律师的工作却用了合伙人工时，并按差额定价。

• 抓住重复出席

  准则只允许一人出席的庭审，来了三位计时人员。

• 对照聘用函检验费率上调

  在没有履行聘用函要求的通知的情况下实施的涨价，往往一年都没人注意到。

• 不评判任何法律工作

  某项工作值不值得做，是法律判断。它核对的是账单与你所约定的内容。

这会改变什么

运行方式

该智能体通过 PROMIVO 运行时在服务器端运行。每次运行都会逐步记录，每次工具调用在执行前都会进行权限检查。

1. 1输入按智能体的输入结构进行校验
2. 2模型claude-opus-5，并自动回退
3. 3工具search_knowledge, extract_structured_data
4. 4权限自动执行 READ 级操作；更高的等待你批准
5. 5输出符合输出结构的结构化结果
6. 6日志记录 token、耗时和每一个步骤

演示

演示数据Illustrative sample output, abridged.

{
  "budget": 240000,
  "matter": "Harbour dispute",
  "currency": "USD",
  "invoices": []
}

{
  "escalate": true,
  "findings": [
    {
      "type": "off-rate-card-timekeeper",
      "hours": 41,
      "clause": "Guidelines 2.1 — only timekeepers approved in writing may bill to the matter.",
      "detail": "Two timekeepers billed 41 hours between them and appear on no approved list or rate card.",
      "amountAtIssue": 16400
    },
    {
      "type": "seniority-mismatch",
      "hours": 22.5,
      "clause": "Guidelines 3.4 — document review is billed at associate grade or below.",
      "detail": "22.5 hours of document review billed at partner rate. Priced at the rate difference, not the full amount.",
      "amountAtIssue": 9450
    },
    {
      "type": "unnotified-rate-increase",
      "hours": 96,
      "clause": "Engagement letter 7.1 — 60 days' written notice of any rate change.",
      "detail": "Partner rate moved from 700 to 780 in January. No notice appears in the correspondence supplied.",
      "amountAtIssue": 7680
    },
    {
      "type": "duplicate-attendance",
      "hours": 13,
      "clause": "Guidelines 5.2 — one fee earner attends a hearing unless agreed in advance.",
      "detail": "Three timekeepers billed the 14 May hearing.",
      "amountAtIssue": 6100
    }
  ],
  "disclaimer": "A check of invoices against the guidelines you agreed. Nothing has been disputed, reduced, approved or paid, no firm contacted, no assessment made of whether any legal work was necessary or well done, and every finding is a question for the firm rather than a proven overcharge.",
  "blockBilling": {
    "note": "Clause 4.2 requires tasks to be billed separately. A quarter of billed time arrives as entries like 'Review documents; correspondence; call with client; consider strategy — 6.4 hours'. Nothing else in this report can be checked against those hours.",
    "hours": 118,
    "entries": 34,
    "shareOfBilledTime": 26.4
  },
  "totalAtIssue": 39630,
  "couldNotCheck": [
    "Whether the 118 block-billed hours are reasonable. That is exactly what block billing prevents, and it is the point of the first finding."
  ],
  "budgetPosition": "Billed 218,000 against a 240,000 budget with the trial preparation phase not yet started.",
  "guidelinesFound": true,
  "escalationReason": "Block billing is 26.4% of billed time, two timekeepers are not on the rate card, and a rate increase appears to have been applied without the notice the engagement letter requires.",
  "questionsForTheFirm": [
    "Please rebill the block-billed entries as separate tasks, per clause 4.2.",
    "Confirm when the two additional timekeepers were approved to the matter, and at what rates.",
    "Provide the notice given for the January rate increase."
  ]
}

使用条件

使用场景

价格

常见问题

评价

客户运行过该智能体后，评价功能将开放。