Reviews against your negotiating playbook, not generic legal opinion
Generic contract AI tells you a liability clause is uncapped. Your legal team already knew. What they need is whether this draft deviates from the positions your company actually takes — the cap you accept, the indemnity you never give, the notice period you always negotiate.
This agent reads those positions from your knowledge base: your playbook, your standard terms, your previously negotiated contracts. Then it reviews the incoming draft clause by clause and reports every deviation with three things — the clause as written, the position it departs from, and the fallback wording your playbook allows.
It does not give legal advice and does not approve anything. Where a clause is unusual, ambiguous, or absent from the playbook, it says so and routes it to a lawyer rather than inventing a position. The output turns a three-hour first pass into a twenty-minute one.
Counsel starts from a marked-up deviation list rather than a blank contract.
Every contract measured against the same written positions, whoever is reviewing and however busy they are.
A negotiating playbook nobody opens is worth nothing. This one is applied to every draft automatically.
Reads your playbook and standard terms from your knowledge base, and cites the internal rule behind every flag.
Each finding names the clause, the position it departs from, and how far — not a general observation about contracts.
Where the playbook records an acceptable alternative, it proposes that wording rather than drafting something new.
A clause your standard terms always include and this draft omits is a finding. Absence is the risk that gets missed.
A clause the playbook has no position on is reported as unaddressed and routed, never assessed from general knowledge.
It produces a reviewed draft for a lawyer. It never signs off, and it says so in every output.
This agent runs server-side through the PROMIVO runtime. Each run is logged step by step and every tool call is permission-checked before it executes.
Demo dataIllustrative sample output, abridged.
{
"ourRole": "supplier",
"contractText": "…",
"agreementType": "MSA"
}{
"clauses": [
{
"status": "deviates",
"distance": "unacceptable",
"asWritten": "Neither party's liability shall be limited in respect of any claim arising under this Agreement.",
"clauseType": "Limitation of liability",
"ourPosition": "Liability capped at fees paid in the preceding 12 months; 24 months with VP Legal approval.",
"sourceDocument": "Negotiating Playbook v4 — section 3.2",
"proposedFallback": "Each party's aggregate liability shall not exceed the fees paid in the twelve months preceding the claim."
}
],
"disclaimer": "A comparison against your recorded positions, not legal advice. No clause has been assessed for enforceability, and nothing here approves this contract for signature.",
"playbookFound": true,
"missingClauses": [
{
"clauseType": "Data processing terms",
"ourPosition": "A DPA is required wherever personal data is processed.",
"sourceDocument": "Standard Terms 2026 — annex B"
}
],
"forLawyerReview": [
"Uncapped liability — outside every recorded position, not a negotiation the playbook covers.",
"No DPA annexed although the service processes customer personal data."
]
}No integrations required.
A prospect insists on their own MSA. Find the deviations before the call.
Check terms against your procurement standards at the volume procurement actually runs at.
The high-volume, low-value review that consumes counsel's week.
Compare what is being renewed against what your positions are now, not what they were then.
$349/month
Billed monthly through your PROMIVO subscription. Cancel at any time.
Runs consume your plan allowance for agent executions and tokens. See plan limits.
No. It compares a draft against positions your organisation wrote down, and reports the differences. It does not interpret law, assess enforceability, or advise on risk. Every output says so, and a qualified lawyer must review the result.
Then it has nothing to review against, and it will say so rather than substituting generic opinion. Most teams find their positions already exist across past contracts and internal memos — load those into the knowledge base and the agent will use them.
No. It has no ability to send anything at all. It produces proposed wording for a person to accept, change, or discard.
Into your own knowledge base, readable only by you and the people you share it with. Retrieval is permission-scoped: the agent cannot surface a document the person asking could not open themselves.
No reviews yet. Reviews open once customers have run this agent.
Tell us what to change and our team will scope a customised version for your business.
Customize this agent