Concepteur de Modèle Opérationnel IA

Aperçu

Bénéfices

Ce qu'il fait

• Note chaque processus sur sa délégabilité

  Fréquence, encadrement par des règles, preuves disponibles, et coût de l’erreur. La plupart des activités d’une entreprise échouent à au moins un critère, et le schéma ne vérifie jamais.

• Conçoit les passages de relais, pas les cases

  Ce que chaque agent produit, qui le vérifie, ce qui se passe quand c’est faux, et la personne nommée qui répond du résultat. Le travail vit dans les flèches.

• Nomme ce qui doit rester humain

  Du travail fréquent et encadré qui ne doit pourtant pas être délégué. La liste la plus précieuse du rapport, et celle que personne ne publie.

• Séquence par dépendance et par retour

  Ni par service, ni par enthousiasme. Une partie ne peut pas démarrer tant que n’existent pas des données qui n’existent pas encore, et il le dit.

• Énonce ce qui doit être vrai d’abord

  La plupart de ces plans échouent sur un prérequis : un enregistrement que personne ne tient, un système sans export, un responsable que personne n’a nommé.

• Ne déploie rien

  Il ne change aucune organisation, n’achète rien et ne configure rien. Chaque sortie est un plan sur lequel des personnes décident.

Ce que cela change

Comment il fonctionne

Cet agent s'exécute côté serveur via l'environnement d'exécution PROMIVO. Chaque exécution est journalisée étape par étape et chaque appel d'outil est soumis à une vérification des autorisations avant d'être exécuté.

1. 1EntréeValidée par rapport au schéma d'entrée de l'agent
2. 2Modèleclaude-opus-5 avec repli automatique
3. 3Outilssearch_knowledge, extract_structured_data
4. 4PermissionsExécute automatiquement les actions READ ; tout ce qui est au-dessus attend une validation
5. 5SortieRésultat structuré conforme au schéma de sortie
6. 6JournalisationJetons, durée et chaque étape sont enregistrés

Démo

Données de démonstrationIllustrative sample output, abridged.

{
  "company": "A dealership group",
  "currency": "USD",
  "industry": "Automotive retail and service",
  "headcount": 240,
  "departments": []
}

{
  "escalate": true,
  "sequence": [
    {
      "phase": "First — read-only, evidence already exists",
      "unblocks": "Nothing depends on these, which is why they go first: they return value while the harder prerequisites are being cleared.",
      "processes": [
        "Warranty claim documentation check",
        "Duplicate payment review"
      ],
      "prerequisitesToClearFirst": [
        "Load the manufacturer's warranty standard into a knowledge base."
      ]
    },
    {
      "phase": "Second — needs data that does not exist yet",
      "unblocks": "Capacity planning across all four sites.",
      "processes": [
        "Technician utilisation analysis"
      ],
      "prerequisitesToClearFirst": [
        "Job times are recorded on paper at two sites. Until that changes, no analysis of this is possible and no agent fixes it."
      ]
    }
  ],
  "disclaimer": "A design, not a deployment. Nothing has been configured, purchased or enabled; no headcount reduction is estimated and no recommendation is framed as replacing a role; savings are estimates from the figures you supplied and are stated net of the effort to supervise them; and no vendor or product is named.",
  "assumptions": [
    "Hours removed are calculated from the run frequency and durations you supplied, and are estimates.",
    "Supervision effort assumes one reviewer per recommendation."
  ],
  "recommended": [
    {
      "process": "Warranty claim documentation check before submission",
      "readOnly": true,
      "department": "Service",
      "buildEffort": "Days",
      "whoChecksIt": "The warranty administrator, who already reviews the claim run.",
      "prerequisite": "The manufacturer's documentation standard has to be in a knowledge base. It currently exists as a PDF on one person's laptop.",
      "agentProduces": "A list of claims that would fail, with the specific element missing from each.",
      "agentReceives": "Repair orders with narrative, operation codes, parts and technician certifications.",
      "whenItIsWrong": "A claim is submitted that would have failed anyway, or a good claim is queried. Both cost minutes, not money.",
      "accountableRole": "Service Manager",
      "capabilityNeeded": "Read each repair order against the manufacturer's documentation standard and report what would be reversed at audit.",
      "netOfSupervision": 44,
      "runEffortPerMonth": "About 2 hours of review",
      "hoursRemovedPerMonth": 46
    }
  ],
  "countHonesty": "Six recommendations from 41 processes reviewed. A diagram of this company would have shown one agent per role and produced around forty. Thirty-five of those touch work that runs under twice a month, has no exportable evidence, or must stay human — and each would still have been something to configure, pay for and watch.",
  "mustStayHuman": [
    {
      "reason": "Frequent enough and rule-bound enough to look automatable. It decides an employment outcome, and a wrong call ends someone's job on a machine's say-so.",
      "process": "Deciding a technician's disciplinary outcome after a workshop incident",
      "department": "People",
      "couldAnAgentHelpAtAll": "It can assemble the evidence pack — records, timelines, policy clauses — so the person deciding has everything. It must not weigh it."
    },
    {
      "reason": "A licensed technician's signature is the product. Nothing here can carry it.",
      "process": "Signing off a vehicle as roadworthy after repair",
      "department": "Service",
      "couldAnAgentHelpAtAll": "It can check the job record is complete before it reaches them, which is a paperwork step and not a judgement."
    }
  ],
  "escalationReason": "Two processes the brief asked to automate decide employment and licensed sign-off outcomes, and one recommendation depends on job times that are currently recorded on paper.",
  "notAnAgentProblem": [
    "Chasing parts orders takes 30 hours a month because the supplier portal has no export. Fixing the export removes the work entirely; an agent would automate a workaround and make it permanent.",
    "Two teams re-key the same customer record. That is one integration, not an agent."
  ]
}

Prérequis

Cas d'usage

Tarifs

FAQ

Avis

Les avis s'ouvrent une fois que des clients ont exécuté cet agent.